Playoff football. Nothing like it.
Needless to say, I loved the morning game. I was rooting for the Ravens to win, but I won't pretend I ever expected anything like the whuppin' they put on the Patriots. It's always nice to see Evil Little Bill get elimimated, so we can be treated to another one of his mumbling monotone press briefings, where he says nothing at all. (Win or lose, I much prefer Rex, who shows signs of being an actual human being, with emotions and a sense of humor and everything). It would have been a much closer game if Welker had not been injured, doubtless (I actually kind of like Welker, though he killed the Jets the last time we played the Pats. It still baffles me why the Dolphins traded him to New England for a bag of old socks, just as it puzzles me why the Raiders would give Randy Moss to New England for one of EVil Bill's old sweatshirts. Must be some sort of evil power) -- but the way the Ravens were playing, they would still have won. Brady looked... dare one say it... mediocre.
The afternoon game was... ah... exciting. And unexpected. I really expected the Pack to handle the Cardinals easily. This is same stuff Arizona pulled last year : winning a sub-par division with such erratic and uninspired play that no one took them seriously, only to come alive suddenly in the post-season. Anyway, Warner played an amazing game. Rodgers was very good too, once he settled down, but those passing stats of Kurt's are mind-boggling. I have to give the Packers credit for an amazing comeback. They looked dead half a dozen times, but just kept kicking dirt off their faces and clawing back out of the grave. And the ending had as much irony as it did drama.
All in all, great football entertainment, though somewhere in the distance I can hear the wails of weeping cheeseheads. An all-time record for scoring in the post-season, I hear. From my point of view, the wrong team won. I guess the Pottsville Maroons will have to wait another week for their curse to kick in.
That being said, I have to take issue with the commentators who are called the Arizona/ Green Bay shootout a "great game." That it wasn't. Exciting, yes. Entertaining, definitely. Good football? No. Neither team brought a defense. Up and down the field, up and down, up and down, pitch and catch. On the rare occasion where a defender actually defended against a pass, he'd get flagged for illegal contact or pass interference. It was a basketball game, is what it was. The sad result for decades of fiddling with rules to give the offense every advantage. Myself, I think they've gone too far, and wish they'd go back, if not to the rules of 50s, at least to those of the 70s. Let the cornerbacks defend, goddamn it.
These rules changes make it almost impossible to compare players from different eras, at least by using stats. The stats for modern players are grossly inflated.
Anyway, the Cardinals go on, the Pack goes home, the Patriots are done... and now the Jets have to face the Chargers, while the Ravens get the Colts. On paper, the Jets don't have much chance against San Diego, but as this weekend's games have proved, anything can happen.
What would be really cool would be if the Jets and Ravens both won. Long odds, I know... but if it happened, Giants Stadium would host one more NFL game before being demolished. The AFC Championship. And wouldn't THAT be cool?
Hey, a boy can dream.
Needless to say, I loved the morning game. I was rooting for the Ravens to win, but I won't pretend I ever expected anything like the whuppin' they put on the Patriots. It's always nice to see Evil Little Bill get elimimated, so we can be treated to another one of his mumbling monotone press briefings, where he says nothing at all. (Win or lose, I much prefer Rex, who shows signs of being an actual human being, with emotions and a sense of humor and everything). It would have been a much closer game if Welker had not been injured, doubtless (I actually kind of like Welker, though he killed the Jets the last time we played the Pats. It still baffles me why the Dolphins traded him to New England for a bag of old socks, just as it puzzles me why the Raiders would give Randy Moss to New England for one of EVil Bill's old sweatshirts. Must be some sort of evil power) -- but the way the Ravens were playing, they would still have won. Brady looked... dare one say it... mediocre.
The afternoon game was... ah... exciting. And unexpected. I really expected the Pack to handle the Cardinals easily. This is same stuff Arizona pulled last year : winning a sub-par division with such erratic and uninspired play that no one took them seriously, only to come alive suddenly in the post-season. Anyway, Warner played an amazing game. Rodgers was very good too, once he settled down, but those passing stats of Kurt's are mind-boggling. I have to give the Packers credit for an amazing comeback. They looked dead half a dozen times, but just kept kicking dirt off their faces and clawing back out of the grave. And the ending had as much irony as it did drama.
All in all, great football entertainment, though somewhere in the distance I can hear the wails of weeping cheeseheads. An all-time record for scoring in the post-season, I hear. From my point of view, the wrong team won. I guess the Pottsville Maroons will have to wait another week for their curse to kick in.
That being said, I have to take issue with the commentators who are called the Arizona/ Green Bay shootout a "great game." That it wasn't. Exciting, yes. Entertaining, definitely. Good football? No. Neither team brought a defense. Up and down the field, up and down, up and down, pitch and catch. On the rare occasion where a defender actually defended against a pass, he'd get flagged for illegal contact or pass interference. It was a basketball game, is what it was. The sad result for decades of fiddling with rules to give the offense every advantage. Myself, I think they've gone too far, and wish they'd go back, if not to the rules of 50s, at least to those of the 70s. Let the cornerbacks defend, goddamn it.
These rules changes make it almost impossible to compare players from different eras, at least by using stats. The stats for modern players are grossly inflated.
Anyway, the Cardinals go on, the Pack goes home, the Patriots are done... and now the Jets have to face the Chargers, while the Ravens get the Colts. On paper, the Jets don't have much chance against San Diego, but as this weekend's games have proved, anything can happen.
What would be really cool would be if the Jets and Ravens both won. Long odds, I know... but if it happened, Giants Stadium would host one more NFL game before being demolished. The AFC Championship. And wouldn't THAT be cool?
Hey, a boy can dream.
- Current Mood:
crazy

Comments
Next week George, you and I will be on opposite sides of the field. For yes, there are five things that I love in this world: my fiance, my family, peanut butter candy, your books, and my Chargers! San Di-e-go, Super Chargers!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whNOfvyP
I'm only a Cardinals' fan because of Larry Fitzgerald. What I saw today, Cardinals probably won't win against the Saints, especially not with that defense. But as you say, stranger things could happen! And honestly... I would be happy if the Cardinals somehow made it to the Super Bowl.
You might not look like you have much chance against San Diego, but you'd probably have even less chance against the Colts :->
in all honesty, I would have much rather my Chargers faced the Pats, as I believe New England presented a better (i.e. easier) matchup for San Diego than your Jets and their defense/running game. Still, I'd love to see what Rivers can do against Revis and company. Good luck to you, and may the better team win.
So George, the next time you blame the Cardinals for all this, think about the real culprits: the Frankfort Yellow Jackets, and the arrogance of the Maroons.
Vikings / 'Boys: I have a feeling Favre (who has NEVER beaten Dallas in a playoff game) is going to get pounded. Dallas wins handily.
The Cardiac Cards will go in and outgun the exposed Saints--with their running game. Cards win.
The NFC Championship Game will rekindle visions of Staubach vs. Hart, but once the ball is kicked off Kurt Warner is going to wish he had Jim Hart's thick body and stumpy legs, because Ware is going to pretzel my ex-Ram. Cowboys to the Super Bowl.
AFC... This is even easier. The Ravens can't beat the Colts, period. The Colts stop the run, and I don't see the Delaware Fighting Hen who quarterbacks the Baltimore team stepping up and winning it with his arm in a shootout. Look for some second-half fireworks from Peyton Manning. A Manning-to-Timberlake touchdown might even happen, it'll be so ugly.
I will be rooting hard for the Jets; not because they are my favorite author's team (by my calculations GRRM's significant shadow only buys them a +2.6% interest increase on my part)... but they don't need the extra motivation on my part when playing any team quarterbacked by Cry Me A Rivers, the worst sore loser (and the worst sore winner) I think I've ever seen in professional sports. Well, in football. I HATE me some San Diego. The hate got so bad this season we rooted for the Raiders over them.
Anyway, doesn't matter. The Jets are toast. You can only go so far with a rookie Q.B. "Go get 'em next year, kid."
(I loved in the press conference following the game how Sanchez gave Pete Carrol hell for jumping off the University of Spoiled Children ship and swimming to Seahawk shores. Hey, playing in New York, you need a sense of humor.)
San Diego will again go into Indy and win. Because that's what they do.
Dallas beats San Diego in the Super Bowl. If you want me to actually watch that game, you'll find me in the pantry with a gun in my freaking mouth.
Kill me now.
Dallas at Minnesota: On offense, the Vikings just have too many weapons for the Cowboys over-achieving defense to contain. Ware is a great pass-rusher, but can be exploited in the run game. Adrian Peterson will run over, around and through the Cowboys all day long. Once A.P. gets revved up, Favre can use play action passing and screens to further slow the pass rush. Watch for quick passes and short crossing routes to Rice, Shiancoe and Berrian. By the 2nd Quarter, Percy Harvin will be wide open on the slot post, since the Safeties will collapse on the short routes. Yes, the Cowboys offense is potent, but they will not be able to run on the Vikings. Barber is usually only good for 3 yards and a cloud of dust anyway, so cut that in half. Felix Jones doesn't get enough carries to be a big factor. Basically, Romo will have to try to win with his arm against the best pass rush in the NFC. Sorry, Dallas, your playoff run is likely over. Vikings 31, Cowboys 17.
Arizona at New Orleans: Part of me wants to say that this will be a repeat of AZ/GB with a ton of points on both sides. Problem is, the Saints have a defense. I like Warner, but the Saints secondary may be the best in the NFL, and they have a very sporadic running game. If the Saints play anything like they did the first 13 weeks of the season, this should be a relatively easy win. If the team that lost their last three shows up, it's going to be time to bring out the sacks again in Aints land. Saints 34, Cardinals 28.
Baltimore at Indianapolis: This game comes down to one player: Ray Rice. If he blows up Indy's suspect run defense, it's going to be a long day for Peyton & Co. The Ravens are a ball control team, and if they can keep Manning from picking them apart, they have a good shot to pull an upset. Indianapolis is the worst 14-2 team I've ever seen, having pulled out several wins in the waning minutes before giving away their final two games to "rest" the starters. Yes, I'm picking an upset. Ravens 27, Colts 21.
New York Jets at San Diego: Man, who would have seen this game a few weeks back? If the Jets defense plays well, this could be a really close, low-scoring game. If not, the Chargers get another bye week (sorry George). The Jets need a big game from their running backs to have a shot. My fear is that Sanchez will make too many rookie mistakes. Chargers 21, Jets 10
The only thing I can think about is that somehow you think his on field persona fits your "crybaby" comment. My question is when. The most famous incident was in the game against Cutler. I think history has shown Cutler is actually the bigger whiner (and by far the bigger loser) in that exchange. Cutler whined his way out of Denver and sits moping on the Bears (who used to be my favorite NFC team) postseason failure.
Or perhaps you didn't like him talking back to the Indy fans who cheered when he was knocked out of the playoff game 2 years ago. (And I thought Indy fans were nice unlike Philly or Giant fans.) So what if he talks to opposing defenses, so did Steve young and Dan Marino and John Elway and so does Brett Favre and gee what do you know Peyton Manning. Hell, even young Sanchez showed up the Raiders by eating a hot dog on the bench (which is actually very funny.)
Rivers is a passinate player who is really coming into his own. He's shown a ton of heart playing on two damaged knees in the AFC championship 2 years ago and I, for one, am truly glad he's a San Diego Charger.
Sorry, GRRM: GO BOLTS!
J-E-T-S! Jets! Jets! Jets!
Gotta give it to Ravens though, they came and they conquered. Good game by them, disappointing for me.
I don't like the rules now. It also puts too much emphasis on the Quarterback. This is a team game. This is not basketball where 1 guy should be able to change a franchise by himself and that 1 guy can only be a quarterback. Quarterbacks have always been the most important players on a team now it is too much. This is in large part due to the rule changes.
That being said most fans like scoring and don't want to see a punt fest (see the complaints about the BCS championship) so it won't happen. Same thing with baseball. Fans generally would rather see a 12-11 game than 2-1 game with a nice hit and run in the middle of it.
On the upside, I hope this means we get a new coach soonish.
I must admit that you are right on a lot of points. We still would have lost if Welker had been on the field, it might have been closer, but we just didn't show up with a playoff caliber team yesterday.
Brady did look mediocre. He is still an incredible QB and if our O line could give him a few seconds, he would look incredible again. I think that he just didn't know where to go for a quick look. 81 is always in double coverage, and 83 was drinking beer with Bob Kraft. Edelmann has some great potential though.
It also would be nice to have a defense.
I'll be rooting against the Jets next weekend. If you kill a Stark for that, can it be Sansa?
-dave
Heh, I'd like so actually see that.
Like you said though anything cold happen and if Baltimore plays like they did this past weekend. There’s going to be some great football going on.
...but Chargers look really strong.
Good luck with the Chargers next week. Hopefully the extra rest they got made them rusty.
And Indy needs to watch out, too. Their defense has some of the same holes that Rice ran all over yesterday. This game is one the Ravens could potentially win.
I know how you feel about Evil Bill, but did anyone see that coming yesterday? The Pats just didn't come to play. It was shocking to see that out of one of his teams. I can take it when my teams lose, but to end the season like that was a disgrace.
And as much as it pains me that the last game in Giants Stadium wouldn't feature the Giants, I can't disagree that would be a pretty awesome send-off if it came to pass.
(and yes I know that Seau is no longer with the Chargers. You're lucky it's not a Fouts icon. ;))
Welker's career high prior to coming to the Patriots was 67 receptions for 687 yards. I remember what the consensus opinion was on the trade and the scouting report on Welker:
1. The Patriots were said to be stupid for making the trade and were grossly overpaying for a 3rd receiver.
2. Welker was one of the worst receivers when it came to yards after the catch.
That is what was said, emphasis on the one of the worst receivers on yards after the catch, that is what was said about him. But of course - three years, 346 receptions, and 3688 yards later - it is now the Dolphins gave him up for nothing and it had nothing to do with Evil Bill seeing something in a player which few others saw, particularly in how he confounded the Patriots' secondary. After all, Miami could have simply matched the 3rd year offer sheet.
I'm not trying to be a jerk, and I know this is your forum, but when you are wrong (and hopelessly biased, as all die-hard fans are, and allowing it to color your thinking), you are wrong.
Welker is only as good as he is when he has a QB to get him the ball. The Dolphins didn't, so I don't think they knew what they had. Moss, well remember he started looking not-so-good those last few seasons with the Vikes and Raiders. Obviously for the same reason as Welker. I'm not a fan-boy but it's all about Brady. I think that guy might make something of himself.
Doesn't Rice remind you of a stockier version of Joe Morris? He does to me. He has excellent quickness to the edges and once he pops through the line, watchout! Were it not for the Ray Lewis knife incident I could easily root for the Ravens. As it was I rooted for the Pats and Junior Seau. Sour-Pus has grown on me. And how about that Edelman kid. Guts!
That second game was one of the most entertaining offensive games I've seen since Jets vs Dolphins twenty-something years ago. When I saw the coin toss I figured Green Bay won. Oh irony of ironies that the game should end on a defensive play.
As far as the rules changes, you are probably right. But, don't you think there have been ebbs and flows in the rules towards both offense and defense over the years. Specifically, I'm thinking of the early eighties and Air Coryell. My memory is faulty so I could be wrong.
Secondly, when you say a game is entertaining and exciting, isn't that pretty much the definition of great? Sure, it wasn't great defense, but that is not required for a game to be great. If so, then the final drive of your Giants' Super Bowl over the Pats wasn't a great one because of some blown plays on defense on that final drive, and the Tyree catch play was a terrible play because the defense didn't sack Manning! No, yesterday was a great game: the sport IS entertainment.
Arizona played very good defense in the first quarter. The rest of the game there were wide open receivers. When a running back can break it to the outside, that's poor defense. When he can shoot through the middle... that's terrible. It wasn't even a case of great down field blocking.
Because I'm a Giants fan I do know what bad D looks like. I've been watching piss-poor defense the entire year.
I will say that I think it was a great game despite the poor defense. The quarterbacks and receivers play were exceptional. Even the running backs performed well when tasked.
I like the Ravens choice for the team name and all that (for Poe, 'cause they're scary, etc.), but it's still not the same. I'm glad we didn't just take the team name and colors from Cleveland, I think all Ravens fans are happy about that. When the team came to Baltimore, many had very mixed feeling about it. Happy to have a team again, uncomfortable about how similar it all was to what we went through with the Colts. A lot of us didn't really accept the team or feel comfortable rooting for them until Cleveland got their new Browns. I know I didn't even pay attention to them until then; it took away the sour taste.
I think you can build a strong D or a strong O, and seldom does a team do both well. Just because there was no D on either side of the Cardinals/Cheesehead matchup, doesn't mean it was a bad game. I think in a game with a high scoring offense, if one of the O lines hadn't shown up the game would have been completely one sided. In some ways I love the fire of a good Offense game vs. a battle of two killer D teams where the final score is 3-0. I think that is why the NFC east is such a huge division. Sure the D is good on those teams, but they tend to have very high scoring divisional games. I also don't agree that the rules favor the WR or QB as much as you are saying. A good CB can play to the rules to draw an offensive penalty just as much as a good WR can. Typically what happens is the QB reads a really good CB coverage and holds onto the ball too long or goes for the short passes. So my personal belief is that it just isn't overly visible in a professional game because most the QB's are able to read the play and decide not to throw against a good CB.
"I had breakfast about every morning when I am in town, or I should say, several mornings, at the Regency. I see my friends the Tisches. Steve Tisch is my close personal friend. I have been to more Giants games. I spent the holidays, I had lunch over the holidays with Woody Johnson. We met for the first time. I am happy for his team."
What a man of the people!