?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

2010 NFL Draft

Feels very strange to have the NFL draft opening in midweek, and in prime time, but there it is. Round One is almost upon us, and the Rams are on the clock.

((And speaking of the Rams, they should take Suh, not Bradford. Defense first. Spags knows that. I wonder if all this QB talk is just a smokescreen? We'll find out soon))

Very odd year for both my teams. I have no idea who the Jets or Giants will select. The Giants have pick #15 in the first round, and those mid-round picks are always hard to project. No way of telling who will still be on the board. Most mock drafts have the Giants going after a linebacker, ideally Roland McClain of Alabama, the consensus #1 LB. The G-Men certainly need a game-changing impact LB, and if McClain falls to them, I think they need to take him... but about half the mocks suggest that he will be gone by the time they pick, most likely to Denver at #11. If it falls out that way, I think it would be a mistake for the Giants to pick the second-best LB at #15. No other player at the position is worth that high a pick. If they must have a LB, and McClain is gone, they should trade down to the end of the round and pick up an extra pick or two.

Some recent reports have the Giants targeting the draft's top running back, C.J. Spiller of Clemson. Spiller would certainly make an exciting addition to the offense... but I don't think there's much chance he will fall to 15, which means in all likelihood the G-Men would need to trade up to get him. Is he worth the price? I don't know. Yes, it's true, the Giants run game fell apart last season... but Brandon Jacobs and Ahmad Bradshaw were both playing with injuries that required post-season surgery, and rookie RB Andre Brown spent the whole year on injured reserve. If all three come back healthy, the Giants should have plenty of talent and depth at the RB position, so I'm not sure we need Spiller.

As for the Jets... things look even more confusing for Gang Green, who don't pick until #29. Up until last month, most of the mock drafts had the Jets taking Notre Dame WR Golden Tate at that position, to give their passing attack a little punch. But then Mike Tannenbaum traded a fifth-round choice to the Steelers for Santonio Holmes and his four-game suspension. Once Holmes gets on the field besides Jericho Cotchery and Braylon "Oops" Edwards, the Jets should be set at wideout, so Tate no longer looks so likely.

After the trade, most draft gurus fighured the Jets would go after a pass-rushing DE or LB sack artist. Despite the league's $1 defense last season, they did not get many sacks. A real force off the edge could only make the D even better. Vernon Gholston, alas, has proved to be a bust. So another pass rusher seemed called for. Only then the Jets signed Jason Taylor away from the Dolphins (Jason Taylor! in Jets green!! the end is nigh!!!). Taylor should give them the disruption Rex wants on passing downs. So maybe they don't need a sack artist now.

Which leaves them... where? I have no idea.

I think it may come down to "Best Player Available" for both my teams.

Can't wait for tomorrow!

Tags:

Comments

( 51 comments — Leave a comment )
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
jeffxandra
Apr. 21st, 2010 07:25 pm (UTC)
Us Ravens fans look forward to opening up the season with a win at Rex Ryan's new Home for Wayward Wide Receivers!
(Deleted comment)
vinnywest
Apr. 21st, 2010 07:47 pm (UTC)
Spiller is overrated because he's the only real pro prospect RB this year. Someone will take him too high (probably Pete Carrol) and he'll be a mediocre at best back.
(no subject) - bbeitel - Apr. 21st, 2010 08:32 pm (UTC) - Expand
Spiller was inconsistent?! - thebigtexas - Apr. 22nd, 2010 05:46 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: Spiller was inconsistent?! - bbeitel - Apr. 23rd, 2010 02:52 am (UTC) - Expand
vinnywest
Apr. 21st, 2010 07:46 pm (UTC)
The problem with taking a defender with the first overall pick (and I say this as a Rams fan,) is that even with a top-notch defender to anchor the line, the team will still be terrible at the QB position. Bulger was never a *bad* QB, necessarily, but the fact that he's been ravaged by injury has made him mostly ineffective. If there's anything the past few years have shown, it is that teams cannot win without a star or star-in-the-making QB. I'd rather take a shot at a QB...because if he falls on his face, the Rams have a chance to draft another elite DB with a top-5 pick next year. The question, in my mind, is which QB to choose. Bradford seems to be the #1 on the board in most people's minds. I don't quite understand this. He's coming off of injury, and played in blowouts (70%+ of his wins were by 10+ points) in college. Whenever he was really tested, he lost. McCoy and Clausen come from pro-style offenses and are much better equipped at this point to be effective starters right off the bat in the NFL. Then again, I'm not capable of leading a team on a 6-42 recent streak, so what do I know?
dizzy34
Apr. 21st, 2010 07:48 pm (UTC)
It's a quarterback league
Sure the Raven's proved otherwise years ago with Dilfer. But the Rams have to roll the dice with a quarterback. It's much harder to win with a care taker quarterback.
jeffxandra
Apr. 21st, 2010 08:22 pm (UTC)
Re: It's a quarterback league
The thing about caretaker QBs is that you need a rock solid line for them to work and the Rams really don't.

If they're convinced that Sam Bradford is the second coming of.. I dunno.. doesn't have to be Peyton Manning or Tom Brady.. Drew Brees let's say, Then they should grab him. Otherwise I'd grab one of the DTs or Okung figuring it's better to work inside (the lines) out when it comes to building a team.
Re: It's a quarterback league - grrm - Apr. 21st, 2010 09:19 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: It's a quarterback league - dizzy34 - Apr. 21st, 2010 09:28 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: It's a quarterback league - jeffxandra - Apr. 22nd, 2010 01:36 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: It's a quarterback league - montydelrogue - Apr. 22nd, 2010 12:27 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: It's a quarterback league - dizzy34 - Apr. 21st, 2010 09:24 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: It's a quarterback league - jeffxandra - Apr. 22nd, 2010 01:33 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: It's a quarterback league - nukerxform - Apr. 22nd, 2010 04:05 pm (UTC) - Expand
(Deleted comment)
(Deleted comment)
evilnioj
Apr. 21st, 2010 08:47 pm (UTC)
NFL
The words gobbledy and gook spring to mind, but then I am from the UK where we still have real rugby.
wygrath
Apr. 21st, 2010 08:58 pm (UTC)
I'd be excited, but I can't remember the last time the Dolphins had a winning season. We couldn't even make it to the Super Bowl when we had Marino, but we did beat the Jets last year... Boo-yah!!
quorothorn
Apr. 21st, 2010 09:26 pm (UTC)
The year that Tom Brady was hurt and the 'Fins thus won the AFC East: 2008. They went 11-5, IIRC. You probably don't remember because it was sandwiched between 1-15 and 7-9 seasons and they went out first round in the playoffs the 11-5 year. And their last winning season aside from that was like 2000, so yeah.
(Deleted comment)
silverhand7
Apr. 22nd, 2010 04:11 am (UTC)
Ben
Being from Pittsburgh,I can tell you that there have been all kind of rumors about the Steelers attempting to trade Ben for a top 10 pick. I think it would be crazy on their part to get rid of him. I am not condoning his actions, a star of his caliper and fame needs to know that he is not just some Joe Frat Boy that can hook up with random girls when they first meet them. He was not charged with a crime and I feel that the suspension was excessive. I'm very sure that it will get dropped down to the 4 game minimum that was talked about for Ben's good behavior. The Steelers Front Office made their statement about off the field antics when they traded Holmes. If they really want to clean up the image of an honorable team they need to get rid of all the trouble makers, Harrison, Reed, and Batch as well. The organization is just trying to please the drunken uneducated football masses in Pittsburgh who are notorious for hating their QB's. Bradshaw refused to come back to Pittsburgh for a decade because of the treatment he got here. Last that I had heard here was that Oakland and Pittsburgh were in heated discussions on the topic.

Ok rant over. Congrats on the Jets signing Jason Taylor, that really has me worried about the playoffs now. I think that the Giants could get what they need in a RB out of Toby Gerhart. He is projected to be a 2nd rounder with implications that he could be a #1 RB in this years draft if he was not white. Interesting water cooler point but not really an issue in my mind. A guy has it or he doesn't. Doesn't matter where he is drafted. I think that the Giants could get him easy in round 2 and use the first pick on something else they need.
thebigtexas
Apr. 22nd, 2010 05:31 am (UTC)
Rolando McClain
Hey GRRM, it's Rolando, not Roland, just FYI.
frrom
Apr. 22nd, 2010 06:20 am (UTC)
As I said in my own LJ, its a sad day for all involved when Jason Taylor signs with the Jets.

I expect he will be all over the Fins as justified punishment for dumping him.
holgerbaehren
Apr. 22nd, 2010 08:58 am (UTC)
Jason Taylor in Green
As a Dolphins Fan it really pains me to see Jason Taylor go to the Jets. I think he has at least a good season in him and its not like the Dolphins Linebacking Corps is so good they couldn't use him. And it's not like he was demanding huge loads of cash or making big problems character-wise. This is the guy who took a big slash in salary to get from Washington back to Florida. I fear he will be a real solid performer for the Jets.
philmophlegm
Apr. 22nd, 2010 09:10 am (UTC)
It may be prime-time over there, but over here, us British draftniks are going to be staying up until 4.00 tomorrow morning! Still, mustn't grumble, this year if you're a UK ESPN subscriber, you get to watch the whole first round in HD. I've never seen Mel Kiper's hair in HD - I can't wait!

I like McClain and I can't see him lasting to the Giants. He would be a good fit for them though. As for the Jets, I always think that if you don't have an obvious need, then a good mantra to stick with is 'Pick the best available offensive lineman'. You stand a good chance of getting value there towards the end of round 1. If not, then another CB. As a Raiders fan, I know the problem with having one superstar CB on one side - teams just through to the other side. Drafting another good CB would make Revis even better.
nukerxform
Apr. 22nd, 2010 10:59 pm (UTC)
I can easily see McClain lasting to and through the Giants. Think Laurinaitis. ILB/MLB is just not an important position. No matter how good a player is, he can't improve the value of his position. Some mocks have McClain as high as #5, which I think is ridiculous. The position IS NOT IMPORTANT, in any scheme. While the Giants could conceivably pick him up to fill a need, I think it is much more likely they trade down to obtain Weatherspoon since McClain projects poorly into Fewell's defense. They could also pick up Spiller (BPA) or Anthony Davis to back up the injured Kareem McKenzie. Personally, I am extremely worried about the depth of our offensive line - if Diehl goes down this season, the Giants' hopes will be FUBAR.
jarathen
Apr. 22nd, 2010 12:15 pm (UTC)
please take bradford, rams
i remember cursing my buccanneers for doing all that late-season winning. if we don't get suh or mccoy, we don't improve where we need it. tampa needs defense bad, and while no one is a sure thing, suh and mccoy are the kind of players you can rebuild a defense around.

you're right - st. louis should pick one of those two, and could probably turn out a good QB with a third-round pick and some time. the question is if spag actually gets to make his own call.

and i don't see big ben going anywhere.

the jets have really been christened as The New Good Franchise this year, George, from Hard Knocks to primetime scheduling on down. Can't wait to see someone knock the Pats down a notch.
nukerxform
Apr. 22nd, 2010 10:51 pm (UTC)
Re: please take bradford, rams
The only two quarterbacks in this draft class worth drafting are Sam Bradford and Jimmy Clausen. Bradford because he has massive potential, and Clausen because he's so ready for the NFL. If St. Louis picks up Suh or McCoy (god forbid), they will end up picking a sub-par quarterback in the second round.

I admit - either Suh or McCoy would immediately improve the Rams hands down. But that type of "improvement" is not what you as fans should want - not only will you have back-to-back losing seasons, but you will also win too many games to pick up a franchise quarterback for the next few years. If the Rams pick up Suh, they will turn from a 1-15 team to a 5-11 team, which is great - but the Texans are a classic example of why a team with a great defense but a subpar offense doesn't win Super Bowls. They are starting to turn this around, but the rule stands. THE RAMS NEED JIMMY CLAUSEN. If they don't get him, they will have another losing season, even if Bradford turns out a hit and not a bust. With Jimmy Clausen, they turn from a team with a horrible offense to a team with a franchise QB, franchise LT, and franchise RB - which is all you need in this day and age to make the playoffs.
metzhead
Apr. 22nd, 2010 12:42 pm (UTC)
Giants need someone for Eli to throw to. Towards the end of the season it was making me upchuck a little everytime he hit someone right in the numbers and they'd drop the ball.

Screw RB's. It's a passing league and even a first round pick will be burnt out in four years.
nukerxform
Apr. 22nd, 2010 10:53 pm (UTC)
Giants have somebody for Eli to throw to in Steve Smith, Mario Manningham, and Kevin Boss. All they need is a revamped secondary to turn them back into the team which won the Super Bowl versus the legendary 2007 Patriots.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
( 51 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

Spain
grrm
George R.R. Martin
George R. R. Martin

Latest Month

October 2017
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner