So, it's been thirty years since we first saw STAR WARS. Hard to believe.
Amidst all the hype and hoopla of this anniversary, I keep seeing people calling STAR WARS "the best science fiction film of all time." Uh... really? I don't think so. The original STAR WARS was a good movie, and EMPIRE STRIKES BACK was even better (Leigh Brackett wrote that one, so there's good reason), but RETURN OF THE JEDI went downhill, and you really don't want to get me started about those three wretched prequels. Even the original triad hasn't aged as gracefully as one might have hoped. It has become apparent that much of the charm of the first movie came from the novelty of seeing favorite tropes from classic SF books realized on the screen for the first time... but that charm wears off on repeated viewings, and once it does you realize that neither the story is, well... not all that it could have been. You also realize how much retrofitting and backfill has gone on since the movie's first release. I don't care what Lucas says, I will never believe that Darth was meant to Luke's father from the outset, or that the romantic pairing was always supposed to be Leia and Han (it is plainly Luke and Leia)... and damn it, Han shoots first!
Never mind about all that. STAR WARS is what it is, and it had a profound effect on both SF and on film, for both good and ill... but it is not even close to being the best SF movie of all time.
What's better? Try 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY. Try THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL. Try the first ALIEN, or even better, ALIENS (but never mention the third installment in my presence). Try CHARLIE (the film version of the classic "Flowers for Algernon"). All worthy. Try George Pal's wonderful adaptation of H.G. Wells' WAR OF THE WORLDS (a better film than the Spielberg remake, in my opinion), or Pal's version of THE TIME MACHINE (a MUCH better film than the really truly abominable recent remake).
The best, though?
MGM, 1956. Leslie Nielson, Anne Francis, Walter Pidgeon, Robbie the Robot. FORBIDDEN PLANET. Also known as the Tempest on Altair-4. Inspired by Shakespeare, in turn it inspired Gene Roddenberry, who borrowed heavily from it when coming up with STAR TREK. State of the art special effects (for 1956, admittedly), gripping story, some fine performances (especially by Walter Pidgeon, whose performance as Morbius beats anything ever seen in any of the STAR WARS films). Unlike STAR WARS, this is a film that only grows richer every time you watch it. A monster that makes sense, characters with a little psychological depth, science that isn't just empty technobabble, a sexy heroine, a tragic hero, the awesome caverns of the Krel... FORBIDDEN PLANET has it all.
Winner and still champion.
The best science fiction film of all time.
Amidst all the hype and hoopla of this anniversary, I keep seeing people calling STAR WARS "the best science fiction film of all time." Uh... really? I don't think so. The original STAR WARS was a good movie, and EMPIRE STRIKES BACK was even better (Leigh Brackett wrote that one, so there's good reason), but RETURN OF THE JEDI went downhill, and you really don't want to get me started about those three wretched prequels. Even the original triad hasn't aged as gracefully as one might have hoped. It has become apparent that much of the charm of the first movie came from the novelty of seeing favorite tropes from classic SF books realized on the screen for the first time... but that charm wears off on repeated viewings, and once it does you realize that neither the story is, well... not all that it could have been. You also realize how much retrofitting and backfill has gone on since the movie's first release. I don't care what Lucas says, I will never believe that Darth was meant to Luke's father from the outset, or that the romantic pairing was always supposed to be Leia and Han (it is plainly Luke and Leia)... and damn it, Han shoots first!
Never mind about all that. STAR WARS is what it is, and it had a profound effect on both SF and on film, for both good and ill... but it is not even close to being the best SF movie of all time.
What's better? Try 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY. Try THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL. Try the first ALIEN, or even better, ALIENS (but never mention the third installment in my presence). Try CHARLIE (the film version of the classic "Flowers for Algernon"). All worthy. Try George Pal's wonderful adaptation of H.G. Wells' WAR OF THE WORLDS (a better film than the Spielberg remake, in my opinion), or Pal's version of THE TIME MACHINE (a MUCH better film than the really truly abominable recent remake).
The best, though?
MGM, 1956. Leslie Nielson, Anne Francis, Walter Pidgeon, Robbie the Robot. FORBIDDEN PLANET. Also known as the Tempest on Altair-4. Inspired by Shakespeare, in turn it inspired Gene Roddenberry, who borrowed heavily from it when coming up with STAR TREK. State of the art special effects (for 1956, admittedly), gripping story, some fine performances (especially by Walter Pidgeon, whose performance as Morbius beats anything ever seen in any of the STAR WARS films). Unlike STAR WARS, this is a film that only grows richer every time you watch it. A monster that makes sense, characters with a little psychological depth, science that isn't just empty technobabble, a sexy heroine, a tragic hero, the awesome caverns of the Krel... FORBIDDEN PLANET has it all.
Winner and still champion.
The best science fiction film of all time.

Comments
This reviewer hated it, but I had a lot of fun, so if you ever get a chance to see the play, I'd say it's worth it.
My personal vote goes for Aliens. It was my first sci fi movie ever and it had a profound effect on me. You know, besides the nightmares.
:)
Recently I liked Will Smiths; I Robot. Although I have never read the book so not sure how it maches up..
I do like 2001, but for entirely different reasons. As pure cinema it's nothing short of gripping...I love the long stretches of silence/music, and the use of minimalist sound effects (for example, the astronauts' breathing) to completely engross/unnerve. I haven't seen Forbidden Planet but it sounds intriguing!
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Sheep%20isl
The sequels on the other hand...
Hell I even loved the new trilogy. It doesnt hold a candle to the first one , but the new movies are some of the best adventure movies of the last 20 years. Crap now I have to go watch all six again hehe.
PS sorry about my english , I spell better in greek :)
Forbidden Planet was a good movie, and certainly better than Star Wars and 2001.
I have seen very few good SF or fantasy movies recently; they re-write everything and take away all the literary surprises. I hated the movie version of "The Lord of the Rings," not because of character changes, but every possible surprise was ruined; war scenes made no sense; Aragorn's and the Hobbits' offers of service were turned into kidnapping; etc. etc. (Sorry, I also felt that Sandkings as a movie did not have the pathos and sarcasm of the original story.)
Good movies (besides Forbidden Planet):
The Day the Earth Stood Still, Bladerunner, The Lathe of Heaven (original version, not the horrible re-make), and even Baron Munchausen for its vision, and Dragonslayer for its sarcasm.
My all time favorite? Two movies: both the Russian and English versions of Solaris, spectacular, disturbing, but more clear ending than 2001.
The Star Wars films are movies for children.
Forbidden Planet and The Day the Earth Stood Still were OK, but you only need to see them once.
Close Encounters of the Third Kind was the best sci-fi movie ever done.
Period.
End of Story.
as for han shooting 1st, i agree. he wouldnt live very long shooting 2nd. iv-vi were a lot of fun. 'though ford couldnt act @ that time, his improv lines regarding his thoughts on the force, &, "i know," made iv-vi more fun & left a gaping hole in i-iii. i dont think lucas ever meant to have han shoot 2nd, or spielberg meant for the agents in "et" to have walkie talkies instead of guns, or children dressing up as hobos instead of terrorists. i think it was revisionist history at work after 9/11.
"2001" is visually stunning & has beautiful music, like "fantasia." "2001" is boring, yet intriguing to me.[when the year 2001 started, i thought we'd find a monilith on the moon. haven't read the book yet.]
my best science fiction films list: "Forbidden Planet" ['though it has been a very long time, & i only saw most of it, but wow!], "The Day The Earth Stood Still" [would a mother actually allow a stranger to take her daughter to the movies?], "War Of The Worlds" [the original, havent seen spielberg's remake], "Solaris" [the original, havent seen the remake yet, but wanted to see the original 1st, because i normally hate remakes. (i like george clooney)], "Blade Runner" [went to see it because i love the whole concept, & liked harrison ford before i saw this film & liked rutger hauer after seeing this film], "The 5th Element" [i heard this was a remake, of what, i dont know. but to me, this was so original to me, it's one of those films i can see again & again], "Serenity" [1 of my very best friends recommended it.this film is awesome/original], "1984" [because "1984" is now & has been since 1948 (at least)], "Gattaca" [our impending future], "Hardware Wars," "Spaceballs," "Terminator 1 & 2," "The 6th Day," "Imposter" [like "blade runner," based on a Philip K Dick story], "The Empire Strikes Back" [definitely the original, i prefer when luke takes a step off of the plank, defiantly, telling his father he refuses the dark side, not falling clumsily in the reworked version], "Revenge Of The Sith" [if anakin hadnt walked in, mace windu wouldve killed the emperor], "V For Vendetta" [1 of my favorite films. period.(see "serenity")], "The Matrix" [until ii(which was ok)] & iii [which ruined "the matrix"(i wished i couldve my $$ back on iii)], "Metropolis" [except for the music], "Le Voyage Dans La Lune" [without this film, what would we be watching?]
fantasy in space. High Fantasy, they have Kings and Queens and Knights and Laser SWORDS. I don't believe that it was ever meant to be considered Science by any stretch.
Couldn't agree more.
=]'
I'd have to call Blade Runner the best Sci Fi movie, though. Other favorites, all of which are previously mentioned; Terminator I and II, Alien (still scares the crap out of me), Aliens, Wrath of Khan, Empire Strikes Back, Predator (what other movie stars 2 future governors?), and Serenity. One minor thing about Serenity that bugs me: you could hear the explosions in a vacuum, a detail that Firefly got right. I loved the complete silence.
I agree with most of the quoted films here, but what really disturbs me is the fact that all really good sf (and fantasy) movies are quite old (exceptions like LotR included). Newer movies are numerically rare and overburdened with CGI effects, leaving no room for either character evolution or a real description of the world outlined. I, for one, am very interested in hints at what keeps the world I see on the screen running (not much time for the director to get them in in 120 minutes worth of movie-time, of course).
A good example is Bladerunner, while watching you get a good impression of the world that is outside the main story.
The director of the remake of Raumpatroullie Orion (german classic 50s sf series) said in an interview that for a modern audience you have to show a fast pace. The original series had a spaceship launch scene that went on for over 3 minutes, the remake had to cut it down to about a minute or so because the audience wouldn't watch a launch for a longer time without falling to sleep.
While movies nowadays really lack in terms of world detail, the TV-shows make use of long storylines, good examples are Battlestar Galactica and Firefly, but also the imo underestimated Dark Angel series. Sadly those incredibly rich stories seem to impede the popularity, which means they get dropped after one or two seasons, or don't get the finale they deserved like Babylon 5.
My greatest hope at the moment is that Battlestar Galactica won't die on the way to earth (or somewhere else).
Star Wars is important for the mythos. Who cares about the crappy dialogue? I'm watching the rest of the world unfold in all its gritty detail. This is what drew me and keeps me interested in the Ice and Fire story...except thankfully your dialogue is much better :-)