I usually make it a policy not to comment on reviews, especially negative reviewers. When you put your art out there in the marketplace on public view, some are going to like and some are going to hate it. Comes with the territory. And like Superchicken always said, I knew the job was dangerous when I took it.
Normally, I would not even comment on something as spectacularly wrong-headed and condescending as the review of the HBO series GAME OF THRONES recenltly published in the NEW YORK TIMES. There have been dozens and dozens of reviews of the show coming out all over the place, in newspaper and magazines, on television and radio, and of course on the web. Most, I am pleased to say, have been very good, but of course there are some bad ones as well. C'est la vie.
((Okay, I will confess, it does cheese me when I come across a reviewer who simply hates all fantasy. I had hoped that kind of literary snobbism was extinct, or nearly so. Maybe not.))
But the startling assertion in the TIMES review that women could not possibly like fantasy unless a lot of graphic sex was added to it (??) has prompted me to break my "no comment" rule. At least to extent of this post.
I see this morning that legions of female fantasy readers and self-proclaimed "geek girls" and "scifi chicks" have risen up all over the internet to say all the things that I'm too polite and too busy to say. And a lot more besides. I'd link to their blogs and posts here, but it would take hours. Google will lead you to them, if you're interested. It would seem that so many outraged emails and posts poured into the TIMES that they had to shut down the comments section for the review.
I am not going to get into it myself, except to say
(1) if I am writing "boy fiction," who are all those boys with breasts who keep turning up by the hundreds at my signings and readings?
and
(2) thank you, geek girls! I love you all.
Normally, I would not even comment on something as spectacularly wrong-headed and condescending as the review of the HBO series GAME OF THRONES recenltly published in the NEW YORK TIMES. There have been dozens and dozens of reviews of the show coming out all over the place, in newspaper and magazines, on television and radio, and of course on the web. Most, I am pleased to say, have been very good, but of course there are some bad ones as well. C'est la vie.
((Okay, I will confess, it does cheese me when I come across a reviewer who simply hates all fantasy. I had hoped that kind of literary snobbism was extinct, or nearly so. Maybe not.))
But the startling assertion in the TIMES review that women could not possibly like fantasy unless a lot of graphic sex was added to it (??) has prompted me to break my "no comment" rule. At least to extent of this post.
I see this morning that legions of female fantasy readers and self-proclaimed "geek girls" and "scifi chicks" have risen up all over the internet to say all the things that I'm too polite and too busy to say. And a lot more besides. I'd link to their blogs and posts here, but it would take hours. Google will lead you to them, if you're interested. It would seem that so many outraged emails and posts poured into the TIMES that they had to shut down the comments section for the review.
I am not going to get into it myself, except to say
(1) if I am writing "boy fiction," who are all those boys with breasts who keep turning up by the hundreds at my signings and readings?
and
(2) thank you, geek girls! I love you all.
- Current Location:home
- Current Mood:
annoyed

Comments
One of the things that really made me chuckle was her confusion about GOT being FANTASY, not HISTORY.
It's nasty, nasty sexism. And it's doubly insulting when arrogant women preach about who women must be in order to validate their ignorance.
THIS chick digs chainmail.
This woman's review, and the women who have stood up in response to it, have convinced me that I am missing something wonderful, and will be correcting this oversight quickly.
That article was laughable. The author clearly hadn't read the books, and if she thinks that incest, rape, etc are added to a story to attract female readers...well...uhh...what kind of women do they know!??!
You keep writing quality fantasy, and both men and women will continue to read them.
I'm glad you took a moment to comment on this, even if it meant breaking your own rule.
All that "boys with breasts who keep turning up by the hundreds at your signings and readings" (including me, even if I had not been able to go to one of your signings (yet)) know that fantasy is not just for boys. Thank you, for giving us (boys and girls) your awesome books
I understand why you wouldn't normally comment on reviews. But some are so wrong it must be questioned why the author is even considered a professional reviewer.
Great characters and stories are what keeps people coming back for more. Cliffhangers don't hurt either. The only question here is whether the actors in Game can deliver, and how well the story can be translated onto the screen. I'm optimistic about it. I'm hoping it will be even better than Lost.
It seems to me the critic just didn't want to be bothered with having to watch something associated with the genre. She then took it a step further and displayed her ignorance to all. Dumb. Why did she even bother? Did she have an abusive brother who hit her with his fantasy books? Surely there's something personal behind that review.
And wait a mo... I thought guys were the ones who were supposed to be into things for the sex? Can't they get their sexist stereotypes right?!
/another (obviously non-existant) geek girl
Anyway, encouraged by a book club here on LJ to read the first book in handy sections (and then discuss weekly comments) I just fell in love with 'A Game of Thrones' (and right away invested in getting hardbacks of Books 1 & 2 sent over from USA).
They certainly are not just for boys (or men) - as a woman who has been enthusiastic about fantasy from an early age I've never been put off by battles though I have to admit that I am drawn more to the court intrigues.
So huge thank you for such excellent world-building as well as characters I can love and hate and all the rest.
Vivienne
IMO you cannot write a work that "works" unless it says something about the human condition. This is the tie that binds. Write it well and both women and men will be interested.