?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

A Simple Observation

New Mexico has been a battlefield state in past presidential elections, most recently in 2000 and 2004, but Obama carried it easily both times, and of late it has been trending blue. So much so that until very recently it was considered safe for Clinton this time around, which meant that neither side was paying us much attention.

That's changed in the last couple of weeks. All of a sudden, it is thought that the Land of Enchantment is in play, and we're seeing campaign commercials for both sides daily, often hourly. All summer our airwaves were blessedly free of those, but now one can't escape them. Some of them are positive ads, about the wonderful things the candidates is going to do for us... but the vast majority are negative, attacking the opponent. Sadly, that seems to have become the default setting for politics in this 21st century of ours.

Watching them, however, a very huge and basic difference struck me.

The Trump commercials are all fairly standard political attack ads. You've seen a thousand like them. Find some bad pictures of the opponent, in this case Hillary, pictures that make them look ugly or angry or crazed (easily done, there are thousands of unflattering pictures of any public figure floating around these days). If they are not bad enough, put them up in black & white, which always seems to make them worse. Juxtapose them with negative imagery, maybe some out of context headlines. Use a faceless narrator's voice over the pictures telling us that the candidate is corrupt or a liar or "too extreme." The latest Trump ad manages to add Anthony Weiner, who is called "Pervert Anthony Weiner." The blatant name-calling -- flinging around words like 'pervert' and 'crooked' -- is not something we have often seen before in American politics, unless you go back to the 18th and 19th centuries; that's Trump's own original ugly contribution to lowering the tenor of political discourse. The rest, however, is Attack Ad 101.

What's notable here is that the whole thing is accusation. It's one side calling the other side names. If any political positions are presented, they are usually distorted. Smith says Jones is corrupt. Jones says Smith is a liar. Smith says Jones voted for something unpopular. Jones says Smith favors something vile. Trump's ads against Hillary tick every box here. They are made of assertion, innuendo, and name-calling, but there's no substance to them.

Clinton's ads are something else. Very different, and -- to my mind -- much more truthful. The star of all the Clinton ads in Donald J. Trump. There are no deliberately unflattering photographs, however. Nothing in black and white. Just video clips, full color, professional footage from news cameras at his rallies, interviews, television appearances. There's no name-calling either. Clinton doesn't need to label Trump as "crooked" or "a liar" or link him with "perverts." Clinton's ads just show Trump being Trump.

So what we have here is not Smith claiming that Jones said terrible things. What we have is actual footage of Jones saying and doing those things. No one has to accuse Trump of anything, he has laid it all out there in public for the world to see.

Yes, he mocked a disabled reporter. There he is, doing it.

Yes, he told Billy Bush he liked to kiss women without their consent and grab them by their pussies. There he is, boasting about it. When you're a star, you can do anything.

No need to accuse Trump of going into the dressing rooms of Miss Universe and Miss Teen USA pagaents when the contestants were changing so he could see them naked. There's Trump himself, telling Howard Stern about it.

Yes, he said women should be punished for having abortions. There he is, telling Chris Matthews. His own words, his own face.

Yes, he said he wants to ban all Muslims from entering the US. Here, see the clip.

Yes, he's in favor of Japan and Saudi Arabia and South Korea having nukes, here's the clip where he says so.

And on and on and on and on. The Gold Star family, the bad hombres, Judge Curiel, the Miss Universe contestant... his own speeches, his own tweets, his own words.

The usual pattern in election is that Smith says Jones said something terrible, and Jones denies it. Not so here. Hillary does not need to use the sort of hoary attack ads that Trump is using. She only needs to present him as he is, and let his own words condemn them.

And they do.

In my lifetime, there has never been a presidential candidate more unfit to lead this nation.

You don't need to like Hillary. You don't need to listen to what Hillary says about Trump, or what I say about Trump. You just need to listen to Trump. If you can do that, and still consider voting for him... well...

Pappy Bush lost an election by looking at his watch. Michael Dukakis lost an election by riding around in a tank. Howard Dean lost an election by giving a yeeeehah scream. Trivial things. Insignificant things. Trump, on the other hand, has said the vilest things any presidential candidate has said since George Wallace, and he's rising in the polls.

He has boasted that he could shoot someone dead on Fifth Avenue and still not lose any votes. I am beginning to think he was right.

Tags:

Comments

( 223 comments )
Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
Yestfl
Nov. 4th, 2016 07:57 pm (UTC)
Hello Mr. Martin
If anyone knows about politics it's you!
Truer words have never been spoken. I, too, live in Santa Fe and I, too, am nervous about the election. I lost my "I voted" sticker and I was really looking forward to the free popcorn. I am too shy to say hello when I see you in town, but next time, maybe I will. Hugs!
leprechaun
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:00 pm (UTC)
I'll just say I'm happy I don't have to make this choice. Really don't envy the Americans this time.
Blair Batchelor
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:01 pm (UTC)
Well said
Very true George,

If you could come over to the UK and simplify our situation for some others it would be appreciated.

Thanks
Anthony Callahan
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:07 pm (UTC)
George, I understand that you favor Hillary over Trump, but when you start telling lies you make yourself look as bad as them. There's 3 of them you just listed that stood right out as blatantly false.
1. Trump did not say "ban all muslims". He said to temporarily ban them until we find a way to vet them. That's a big difference from straight up banning them. Almost every high ranking Defense expert has said that ISIS will infiltrate the refugee flow. Are we racist now if we dont let the enemy onto our shores?
2. Trump did not mock that disabled reporter. He did the same exact thing talking about Ted Cruz and him being flustered and no one said a word. The reporter in question had a deformed arm. Trump is clearly shaking both arms and stuttering the same way someone who is panicking would be. If the reporter had cerebral palsy I would say yes. But come on, when I see that I do not see how that is making fun of someone with 1 deformed hand.
3. This is your most blatant one. Chris Matthews asked Trump a hypothetical, saying if abortion were to be outlawed, should there be punishment for those who get them? Trump clearly responded that the law is the law and you shouldn't be allowed to break them even if you disagree with them. Just because you don't like a law doesn't mean you can break it and get a free ride.
I'm not big fan of Trump myself, and I wont even begin to defend some of the other insane things he has said. But can we atleast be truthful and not misleading?
grrm
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:20 pm (UTC)
There are no lies in my post. The videos are right there for everyone to see.

1. Yes, if we ban all Muslims -- even "temporarily" -- for fear a few may be ISIS sympathizers, that's racist. And unAmerican. Vet them, sure. We already vet them. The vast majority are desperate people trying to get AWAY from ISIS, many of them women and children. Will there be a few bad guys in there? Sure. There have been bad guys in every wave of immigrants to come to America, a handful in among all the good ones. Bad Irish, bad Germans, bad Italians. That doesn't mean we shut the doors. We're the land of the free and the home of the BRAVE, remember?

2. So mocking a guy with cerebral palsy would be a no-no, but mocking a stutterer with a deformed arm is okay? Really?? No, sorry, it was disgusting and offensive. Can you imagine Ronald Reagan doing that? John F. Kennedy? Obama, Eisenhower, ANYONE?

3. Again, the tape is there. Hypothetical question or not, that was his answer. Hypothetical questions are still questions, and the way one answers them gives insight into the way one thinks.

Edited at 2016-11-04 08:42 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - Anthony Callahan - Nov. 4th, 2016 09:17 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - grrm - Nov. 4th, 2016 09:39 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - Anthony Callahan - Nov. 4th, 2016 09:49 pm (UTC) - Expand
Ban All Muslims - Lynne Hughes - Nov. 5th, 2016 03:25 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - Daniel De Simone - Nov. 4th, 2016 09:54 pm (UTC) - Expand
Peach George - Chris Davies - Nov. 4th, 2016 11:58 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - redguardricky - Nov. 5th, 2016 01:18 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - josiegel - Nov. 4th, 2016 08:36 pm (UTC) - Expand
Traci Bear Thiele
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:09 pm (UTC)
Need a word.
My friends and I have been having a lengthy discussion in the last few days. We are discussing ways to talk to people with opposing viewpoints without making them feel insulted. We have tossed about key words that might open people up, to a new way of thinking. You cannot use most words that normally mean "someone who believes lies" because the moment you let someone know you don't agree with them anything you say will sound like an insult.

Words normally acceptable like 'naive' or 'gullible' are considered too abrasive. I am climbing the mountain to speek to the wise master You are the Maester of Words.

Do you have a word or two, that might let someone know you think they may be wrong, and you want them to consider another view. Its a balancing act. Just one word, or two, or a simple sentence? MUCHAS GRACIAS.
grrm
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:13 pm (UTC)
Re: Need a word.
Ah, would that I had the magic word you seek.

Alas, I'm just a writer, not a jedi. If only that "these are not the droids you want" thing worked, we could just tell Trump voters "this is not the president you want."
Re: Need a word. - dragonborngurl - Nov. 4th, 2016 09:19 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: Need a word. - illborn_usurper - Nov. 4th, 2016 09:00 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: Need a word. - bigbadbruin270 - Nov. 4th, 2016 09:53 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: Need a word. - Gordon Landis - Nov. 4th, 2016 09:36 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: Need a word. - mengu - Nov. 5th, 2016 12:33 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - lastalda - Nov. 5th, 2016 10:29 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - lastalda - Nov. 5th, 2016 10:32 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: Need a word. - RM Busch - Nov. 5th, 2016 04:37 pm (UTC) - Expand
kriekit
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:09 pm (UTC)
I'm a South African living in Ireland - I have no direct stake in this election, yet the last couple of days I walk around with a knotted stomach, because it looks like the unbelievable might be possible, that it actually has become possible for Trump to win.
redguardricky
Nov. 5th, 2016 12:15 am (UTC)
The tragic thing about an American election is that the whole world has a stake in it. It isn't like when the Phillipines gets taken over by Duterte, who proceeds to make a fool of himself and run the country badly. The Phillipines isn't big or powerful enough to make that much of a difference.

By contrast, the United States is simply too important for bad decisions made here to not effect everyone else. If the United States has a President who thinks climate change is a hoax, and he withdraws from attempts to fight it, the rest of the world will suffer for it. If the United States defaults on U.S. debt, the whole world economy will suffer fo it. If the United States stops caring about nuclear proliferation because the President isn't intelligent enough to understand why it's an issue and isn't humble enough to listen to advice from more knowledgeable people ("I know more about ISIS than the generals!"), then there will be more nuclear proliferation.

So yes, we should all be walking around with knotted stomachs until the danger has passed.

Edited at 2016-11-05 12:19 am (UTC)
(no subject) - dewline - Nov. 5th, 2016 12:26 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - mizkit - Nov. 5th, 2016 09:42 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - kriekit - Nov. 5th, 2016 07:11 pm (UTC) - Expand
jcherry
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:11 pm (UTC)
Wow
George, this post was absolutely spot on. Bravo for speaking up, as a public figure I hope more people will see reason with what you've written here. As someone in the always constant battleground state of Florida, I can empathize with the sickening ad's that are non-stop. Last night while watching the big bang theory with my 10 year old son a new trump commercial came on and this one was a cartoon. Yes a cartoon, it was vile and revolting and my son immediately wanted to know why they would do that. I wish I had a good answer for him, but I don't. In any case I would like to show you a campaign ad that is 1 minute long, and great. I don't know anything about the guy in the ad aside from he's not in my state. I hope you like it as much as I did. https://youtu.be/wzjRwNUQDRU

Edit*
P.S. Please do not make a character in any of your book series that is Trumpeske, real life is too much. We can't handle it in fiction also.

Edited at 2016-11-04 08:27 pm (UTC)
Jim Garrett
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:12 pm (UTC)
Don't be right, George
I remember how stunned I was in 2004; I had thought "there's no way people could be so myopic and wrong". This is on a whole other level. Let the Trump train derail and fade away. Please.
ArchiWriting
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:12 pm (UTC)
Thank you
I hope, that as many people as possible realise this. I wish you luck on 11/8. We, in the Czech Republic, voted a president whose courtesy level is at zero and it is hell, I am disgusted by him and disappointed in him, his scandals are just worse and worse.
Greetings from Prague I hope you don't end up like we did.
Wolvie58
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:15 pm (UTC)
could not have been better stated- i hope the land of enchantment stays blue -)
cmelanson
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:15 pm (UTC)
Great Observations
You are so right on every point. He is doing it to himself and the thought anyone could support him is beyond me. He is disgusting. And like you said, no one else had to say it, he's laid it out there on the table for everyone. This election is one that frightens me. I fear for all of humanity if this monster wins. I'm a dual citizen of Canada & the US, but if I were only Canadian, his reach could still extend. Thank you for pointing all of this out...though you shouldn't have to. It is glaringly obvious!
David Levin
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:18 pm (UTC)
Commander-in-Chief
Can you imagine President Trump in charge of our military? In charge of our nuclear arsenal?

Do we need a climate change denying administration? The coral reefs. Species extinction. Environments wiped out. Eventual fight for food and water by all.

We can stop crazies runnng our country. We can work on turning back global warming.

So..... VOTE. Please vote.
Christopher Phillips
Nov. 4th, 2016 10:49 pm (UTC)
RE: Commander-in-Chief
Active duty military prefers trump 3 to 1
Re: Commander-in-Chief - grrm - Nov. 4th, 2016 10:58 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: Commander-in-Chief - Dr_Fagguette - Nov. 5th, 2016 12:12 am (UTC) - Expand
RE: Re: Commander-in-Chief - Christopher Phillips - Nov. 5th, 2016 01:30 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: Re: Commander-in-Chief - Loren Schmidt - Nov. 5th, 2016 09:11 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: Re: Commander-in-Chief - abqlady2 - Nov. 5th, 2016 02:03 pm (UTC) - Expand
RE: Re: Commander-in-Chief - Mike Orenji - Nov. 5th, 2016 03:54 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: Commander-in-Chief - bigbadbruin270 - Nov. 5th, 2016 05:04 am (UTC) - Expand
RE: Re: Commander-in-Chief - Christopher Phillips - Nov. 5th, 2016 06:34 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: Commander-in-Chief - bigbadbruin270 - Nov. 5th, 2016 06:31 pm (UTC) - Expand
RE: Re: Commander-in-Chief - MatthiasSchipp - Nov. 5th, 2016 08:16 pm (UTC) - Expand
pr1ncessaw3some
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:20 pm (UTC)
The fact that Trump has gained in popularity with all the terrible things that he has said and done, the fact that he is going on trial for fraud in November and child rape in December, and people still say things like: "Hillary is just as bad" or "There's no good choice" sickens and terrifies me. Hillary is not perfect, but she is by far the better candidate and the fact that Trump is so closely tied with her in the polls makes me truly terrified for our country. I will be casting my vote and praying that America wakes up. This is NOT the year to throw away votes on third parties . . .
cmelanson
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:33 pm (UTC)
I second that!
I second everything you say. Hillary is nowhere near the level of depravity and general lack of any kind of ethical though as Mr. Trump. He's a loose cannon. And I cannot understand the thought driving the mindset you mention. Beyond that, she is so qualified. I LOVE this article, which points that out beyond any kind of reasonable doubt: http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fbenbosophy.blogspot.ca%2F2016%2F10%2F178-reasons-hillary-clinton-is.html&h=dAQFvHgnW
RPK_
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:22 pm (UTC)
Not one mention..
Not one mention in this article about how Hillary is the most crooked politician to ever run for President! She broke the glass ceiling alright, she's the first candidate to be under multiple FBI investigations. She's lucky the DOJ saved her but last time, but this time I don't see that happening. None of the Clinton cronies can save her from Weinergate.
grrm
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:29 pm (UTC)
Re: Not one mention..
The amount of ignorance displayed in this one short comment is breathtaking.

Hillary is NOT "the most crooked political ever to run for president." You obviously have never taken a history course. That's just the sort of empty name-calling that typifies the Trump campaign.

Hillary is under FBI investigation, sure. So is Trump. Trump will be on trial for rape in a few months. The Clintons have been investigated more than any other public figures in recent history, and NONE of the investigations have ever found proof of anything.

Anthony Weiner's sins belong to Anthony Weiner. And Trump has far more in common with Weiner than Hillary does; Trump is the one who has been accused of multiple counts of sexual assault by a dozen different women.
Re: Not one mention.. - jonathanfly - Nov. 4th, 2016 11:33 pm (UTC) - Expand
RE: Re: Not one mention.. - Joseph Ang - Nov. 4th, 2016 11:55 pm (UTC) - Expand
RE: Re: Not one mention.. - grrm - Nov. 5th, 2016 05:38 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: Not one mention.. - LLakeMichigan - Nov. 5th, 2016 02:27 am (UTC) - Expand
RE: Re: Not one mention.. - grrm - Nov. 5th, 2016 05:59 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - thedixon - Nov. 5th, 2016 04:49 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - grrm - Nov. 5th, 2016 07:26 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: Not one mention.. - writing_mombie - Nov. 5th, 2016 04:59 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: Not one mention.. - cashcraig - Nov. 4th, 2016 09:43 pm (UTC) - Expand
josiegel
Nov. 4th, 2016 08:23 pm (UTC)
Seriously
I feel like I'm speaking a different language or living on a different plane than half the country. It's heartbreaking to know so many fellow Americans can hear his words, look at his record and think he's fit to lead this nation.

Thanks for posting this, you rock
Page 1 of 6
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>
( 223 comments )

Profile

Spain
grrm
George R.R. Martin
George R. R. Martin

Latest Month

February 2018
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728   

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner